Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CITY OF LORAIN, OHIO v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv05002
Plaintiff:
CITY OF LORAIN, OHIO
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Petty et al v. Springowski et al
as 1:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Garon F Petty, Jeanne Petty and Garon F. Petty
Defendant:
Mary Springowski, Cory Shawver, Joshua Thornsberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Martin Robinson v. Jim Simone, et al
as 21-3962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM SIMONE, Police Officer, CHIEF OF POLICE TONY CAMPO, DAVID GRAVES and others
Martin Robinson v. Jim Simone, et al
as 21-3887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM SIMONE, Police Officer, CHIEF OF POLICE CAMPO, DAVID GRAVES and others
Montgomery County Ohio et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as OHN/1:21-OP-45037
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County Ohio, Medina County, City of Parma Heights, Ohio and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Interested Party:
Plaintiffs' Executive Committee for MDL 2804
Montgomery County Ohio et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 1:2021op45037
Plaintiff:
Medina County, City of Parma Heights, Ohio, Valley Fire District and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Robinson v. Jim Simone, et al
as 19-4036
Defendant / Appellee:
LCJ, DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, CITY OF LORAIN MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
CITY OF LORAIN v. REICHL et al
as NJ/2:16-cv-00453
Plaintiff:
CITY OF LORAIN
Defendant:
FRANK A. REICHL , GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION , GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMACE PRODUCTS, LLC and others
CITY OF LORAIN v. REICHL et al
as 2:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
CITY OF LORAIN
Defendant:
FRANK A. REICHL, GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION , GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMACE PRODUCTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
