Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Apartment of Association of Gr, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES AIHM HOTEL/MOTEL ASSOCIATION, in its representative capacity of behalf of its association members, BALUBHAI G. PATEL, HAROLD GREENBERG and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv04479
Plaintiff:
Harold Greenberg, City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel Motel Association, in its representative capacity on behalf of its association members, Balubhai G. Patel and others
Defendant:
Does 1-10 Inclusive, City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 19-56399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUMANTRAI R. AHIR, NIMESH PATEL, MAYUR B. PATEL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel Motel Association et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv01406
Plaintiff:
HSI Hospitality Group, Zachary Morgan Lasry, Ekdant Associates Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel Motel Association et al City of Los Angeles
as 2:2018mc00022
Plaintiff:
108 Motel, Pravin Ahir, Sumantrai R. Ahir and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel Motel Association et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
HSI Hospitality Group, Ekdant Associates Inc., Vijendra Patel and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Barry V. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
