Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Lewis v. Blumer et al
as 2:2021cv02149
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lewis
Defendant:
Vincent Beasley, Fredric Blumer, Unknown Policeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2020cv02710
Plaintiff:
Jarvis R. Hall and Jarvis Ramone Hall
Defendant:
City of Memphis and Shelby County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driskell v. Shelby County Division of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 2:2019cv02809
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections Medical Department, SCDC Staff, City of Memphis and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Driskell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shotwell v. Drewery et al
as 2:2019cv02751
Defendant:
Kersey, Phil Drewery, Jr., Jason Drewery and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Shotwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. City of Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2019cv02679
Defendant:
Unknown City of Memphis Police Lutenent, City of Memphis Police Dept., Unknown Memphis City Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv02282
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Gross, R. Tabor and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Marl Little, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2018cv02522
Plaintiff:
Adrian Stewart
Defendant:
Amy P. Weirich, F. Frias, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02394
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Vinson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, Brad Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02240
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Reed
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mike Rallings, J. Perea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
