Cases 1 - 10 of 18
City of San Jose California v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv02812
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, AGC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City of San Jose California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. City of San Jose (California) et al
as 3:2019cv06767
Defendant:
Ryan Dote, Jaime Marie Kulik, City of San Jose (California) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. City of San Jose, et al
as 5:2019cv06768
Defendant:
Ryan Dote, Jaime Marie Kulik, City of San Jose (California) and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy et al v. San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission et al
as 3:2019cv03984
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, National Passenger Railroad Corporation, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Kara Quirke and Deanna Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beaujayam Ali El Yashu v. The Arrest et al
as 5:2016cv06637
Plaintiff:
King Romano RA Pharaoh Beaujayam Ali El Yashu
Defendant:
The Arrest, Wilson, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Kenney v. Japan, et al
as 12-55780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAPAN, AKA Japan, Inc., THE NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION, TOTTORI PREFECTURAL POLICE and others
Gary Easley v. City of Morgan Hill, et al
as 11-18086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MORGAN HILL, CITY OF SAN JOSE, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and others
Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv05341
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Kyoto Young Womens Academy:
Kyoto Jyosei Gakuin
John B Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Van Lai v. Kathryn Vanhart, et al
as 10-16732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN KIM LAI, on behalf of herself and her minor daughter A. W.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN VANHART, ROBERT VANHART, ANNA PYZYNA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
