Cases 11 - 18 of 18
City of Seattle, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70136
Intervenor:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF LACEY, Washington, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada and others
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES, CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, v. FCC, et al
as 19-70125
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70124
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Adams v. City of San Jose California
as 4:2012cv06276
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
City of San Jose California, Santa Clara County Superior Court, Rise Jones Pichon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. City of San Jose (California) et al
as 5:2010cv01825
Plaintiff:
Phuong Quang Ho
Defendant:
City of San Jose (California), San Jose Police Department, Chief Bob Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sky Chefs, Inc. v. City of San Jose, California
as 5:2009cv03735
Plaintiff:
Sky Chefs, Inc. and Sky Chefs, Inc.
Defendant:
City of San Jose, California
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
