Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Simon v. Broward Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2023cv61935
Plaintiff:
Junior Diessy Simon
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff Office, State of Florida, City of Pompano Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62300
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv61240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
PASSMAN et al v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2014cv00578
Defendant:
ACS STATE AND LOCAL SOLUTIONS INC, CITY OF LAKELAND, CITY OF APOPKA and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DEVILA, SANDRA DELONIS, ERIK BARTENHAGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cruz v. United States of America
as 0:2011cv62193
Plaintiff:
Lazaro E. Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America, Broward County Sheriff's Office and City of Tamarac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frias et al v. City of Tamarac, Florida
as 0:2011cv61870
Plaintiff:
Carlos Frias , Fernando Frias and ELF, LLC
Defendant:
City of Tamarac, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. City of Tamarac, Florida et al
as 0:2011cv61589
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Lewis
Defendant:
City of Tamarac, Florida, Eugene Steinfeld, Ulyises Acuna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Norkunas v. The City of Tamarac, Florida
as 0:2010cv61829
Defendant:
The City of Tamarac, Florida
Plaintiff:
William Norkunas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Prestige Homes of Tamarac, Inc. v. City of Tamarac et al
as 0:2010cv60468
Plaintiff:
Prestige Homes of Tamarac, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Tamarac , Beth Flansbaum-Talabisco, Harry Dressler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
