Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lowe v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Floyd Lowe
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayres v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tadashi Sayres
Defendant:
State of California, State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2023cv06528
Plaintiff:
Duane Johnson
Defendant:
State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of California et al
as 4:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
Carlos S. Smith
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. State of California et al
as 3:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Rhodes
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Bannon v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. O'Bannon
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Lovell Colvin
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
