Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Cagle v. The James Street Group, et al
as 09-6262
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
ROBYN CAGLE, as primary beneficiary of the Structured Settlement Annuity of Shavon R Morris
Defendant - Appellee:
THE JAMES STREET GROUP, CLAYTON A CLARK, CLARK DEPEW & TRACEY LTD., LLP and others
Defendant:
MASSMUTUAL ASSIGNMENT COMPANY, WYETH CORPORATION and CHELSEI COSGROVE
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Intervenor:
SHERRY GOLDEN, SAMANTHA COSGROVE and CATHERINE GARLAND
Cagle v. The James Street Group, et al
as 09-6262
Counter Defendant:
ROBYN CAGLE, as primary beneficiary of the Structured Settlement Annuity of Shavon R Morris
Defendant / Appellee:
THE JAMES STREET GROUP, CLAYTON A CLARK, CLARK DEPEW & TRACEY LTD., LLP and others
Defendant:
MASSMUTUAL ASSIGNMENT COMPANY, WYETH CORPORATION and CHELSEI COSGROVE
Counter Claimant:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Intervenor:
SHERRY GOLDEN, SAMANTHA COSGROVE and CATHERINE GARLAND
Clark, Depew & Tracey et al v. Hackard & Holt et al
as 1:2007cv01789
Plaintiff:
Clark, Depew & Tracey and Clayton Clark
Defendant:
Hackard & Holt, Michael A. Hackard, Theodore J. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Clark, Depew & Tracey et al v. Hackard & Holt et al
as 3:2007cv00512
Plaintiff:
Clark, Depew & Tracey and Clayton Clark
Defendant:
Hackard & Holt, Michael A Hackard, Theodore J Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cagle v. James Street Group The et al
as 5:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Robyn Cagle, Robyn Cagle and Robyn Cagle
Defendant:
James Street Group, The, James Street Group, The, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
Robyn Cagle, Robyn Cagle and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Interpleader:
Wyeth Corporation, Catherine L Garland and Catherine L Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
