Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00155
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
ClearOne Communications v. Shure, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
ClearOne Communications
Defendant:
Shure, Inc. , Biamp Systems Corporation and QSC Audio Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03078
Plaintiff:
Shure Incorporated
Defendant:
ClearOne, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Biamp Systems Corporation, QSC Audio Products, LLC and Shure Incorporated
Counter_claimant:
ClearOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang, et al
as 16-4200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, an individual, JUN YANG, an individual, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
DONALD BOWERS
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc.
as 1:2016cv24338
Plaintiff:
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc.
Defendant:
ClearOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ClearOne v. Dialcom Networks et al
as 2:2016cv00971
Plaintiff:
ClearOne
Defendant:
Dialcom Networks, Jose Enrique Domingu Garcia and Marcelino Ignacio Martine Martin-Ballestro
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc.
as 1:2016cv23156
Plaintiff:
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc.
Defendant:
ClearOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ClearOne v. RSM US LLP
as 2:2016cv00736
Plaintiff:
ClearOne
Defendant:
RSM US LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang (Bowers)
as 16-4083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
:
ClearOne v. New Vad
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
ClearOne
Defendant:
New Vad
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
