Cases 1 - 10 of 20
BAILEY v. KIMMEL CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv03326
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD BAILEY
Defendant:
KIMMEL CENTER and INTERNATION ALLIANCE OF THE THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, ARTISTS AND ALLIED CRAFTS, LOCAL B29
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
BAILEY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05372
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BAILEY , STACY BAILEY BAILEY , KELLIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relation
TOMALSKI et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TOMALSKI , GLENN ARMSTRONG , STEPHEN MATOTEK and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
JEAN-PIERRE v. CBF TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06493
Plaintiff:
ALAIN JEAN-PIERRE
Defendant:
CBF TRUCKING, INC. , CLIFFORD B. FINKLE, JR., INC. , LOCAL 701 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
DELGADO v. KANE et al
as 1:2010cv03855
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DELGADO
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KANE and KANE STEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEACHAUMP v. KANE et al
as 1:2010cv03863
Plaintiff:
MILTON BEACHAUMP
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KANE and KANE STEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. KANE et al
as 1:2010cv03853
Plaintiff:
SHAWN D. JONES
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KANE and KANE STEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPINOSI v. KANE et al
as 1:2010cv03857
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPINOSI
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KANE and KANE STEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
METCALF v. KANE et al
as 1:2010cv03862
Plaintiff:
CARL METCALF
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KANE and KANE STEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SOUDERS v. KANE et al
as 1:2010cv03849
Plaintiff:
ALBERT SOUDERS
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KANE and KANE STEEL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
