Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
TRENTON MUNICIPAL COURT et al v. JEFFERSON
as 3:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
TRENTON MUNICIPAL COURT and KRISTINA M. BRYANT
Defendant:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CONVERSE v. CITY OF ORANGE et al
as 2:2021cv00872
Defendant:
DETECTIVE ROGERS, OFFICER SIMMONDS, CLIFFORD ROSS and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH NOEL, LOUCIANO DESSOURCES, HAILEY DESSOURCES and others
Plaintiff:
MARIE CONVERSE, AN, LD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESSOURCES v. ORANGE et al
as 2:2020cv19886
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DETECTIVE ROGERS, DWAYNE WARREN and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS D DESSOURCES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv15758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CLIFFORD v. PETRILLO et al
as 2:2019cv13571
Defendant:
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER ROMANYSHYN, MICHAEL COBB and JUDGE STEPHEN L. PETRILLO
Plaintiff:
FITZROY A. CLIFFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
EL BEY v. CLARK
as 3:2018cv15377
Plaintiff:
GRAND SHEIK CLIFFORD JEFFERSON EL BEY
Defendant:
JULIA CLARK and CREDIT ACCEPTANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL BEY v. SHERIDAN et al
as 1:2018cv14976
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JEFFERSON EL BEY
Defendant:
KEVIN P. MCGOVERN, JUDGE LOIS H. GOODMAN, JUDGE PETER G. SHERIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL BEY v. STATE
as 3:2018cv09172
Plaintiff:
SHEIK CLIFFORD JEFFERSON EL BEY
Defendant:
STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
