Cases 21 - 30 of 40
AIRPORT ROAD ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
AIRPORT ROAD ASSOCIATES, LTD. , BAYOU DES GLAISES, LTD. , BLOOMFIELD PARTNERSHIP II and others
Defendant:
USA
FINCH v. USA
as 1:2012cv00092
GUMP v. USA
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ERNEST CLIFFORD GUMP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CLIFFORD v. USA
as 1:2010cv00774
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR CATHERINE CLIFFORD
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
CLIFFORD v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00719
Petitioner:
ELEANOR CATHERINE CLIFFORD
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
LOCKWOOD V SHEPPARD MULLIN
as 10-1189
Amicus Curiae:
David Hricik, John T. Cross, NDP Managed Security and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Jonathan Hangartner, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, Steve P. Hassid and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Lawrence B. Lockwood, Panip, LLC, Lawrence B. Lockwood and others
HOWARD et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00575
Plaintiff:
HENRY L. HOWARD , CLIFFORD E. MILLER AND MAY A. MILLER REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST , ROYAL CENTER MASONIC LODGE NO. 585 and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
SINGLETON et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00456
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
STACY SINGLETON , MARTHA A. OSTERMANN , ERNEST E. MOFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE V US
as 09-5084
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Benjamin Branham, Jr., Clifford Lyle Marshall, Danielle Vigil-Masten and others
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee:
United States
Third Party Defendant-Appellee:
Yurok Tribe
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION , CLIFFORD CASSESEKA , JENNIE L. HONANIE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
