Cases 1 - 10 of 19
RISENHOOVER v. SHUI-BIAN et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Defendant:
CHEN SHUI-BIAN, STEPHEN YOUNG, CLIFFORD HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUCKER MEUSE v. WHYTE et al
as 1:2021cv02871
Plaintiff:
AMANDA D. TUCKER MEUSE
Defendant:
CLIFFORD WHYTE and OFFICE OF THE USTP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAAS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HAAS
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, MICHAEL PIWOWAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. RESIDENT AGENCY MARTINSBURG
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
RESIDENT AGENCY MARTINSBURG, MARTINEZ , JUDY PRESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROBINSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
JAMAL B. ROBINSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , SCOTT PINTO , MAURICE CLIFFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
O'NEAL v. PRETRIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
LAFRANCES DUDLEY O'NEAL
Defendant:
PRETRIAL SERVICES , U.S PROBATION DEPARTMENT , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS , OFFICE OF THE CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEEKS v. CORZINE et al
as 1:2008cv01705
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD FREDERICK WEEKS
Defendant:
JON S. CORZINE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JENNIFER VELEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
