Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Guzman et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 4:2021cv12290
Plaintiff:
Roberto Guzman, Khalil Muhammad and Clifford Williams
Defendant:
City of Detroit, DONALD OWENS and Nathaniel Mullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv13794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hock et al v. Buffa et al
as 2:2019cv11785
Plaintiff:
Clifford Frost, Sallie Hock, Darrell Vickers and others
Defendant:
Sonja Buffa and Warren City Election Commission
Intervenor Defendant:
Connor Berdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkovic v. Attorney Grievance Commission et al
as 2:2017cv10281
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barkovic
Defendant:
Attorney Grievance Commission, Alan Gershel, Robert Edick and others
Griggs et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2015cv13822
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Breeane Ortiz and Clifford Kleszcz
Plaintiff:
Sonja Griggs , Shetaya Griggs and William Griggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kaminski et al v. Coulter et al
as 2:2015cv12810
Plaintiff:
Cheryl N. Kaminski , Lincoln Park Police and Fire Retirees Association, Inc. , Michael J. Moulios and others
Defendant:
Brad L. Coulter , R. Kevin Clinton, Thomas E. Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portillo-Dowdy et al v. Riverview, City of et al
as 2:2014cv12469
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Portillo-Dowdy and Malhia Rehman
Defendant:
Riverview, City of , Clifford Rosenbohm , Michael P. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joy v. Georgia et al
as 2:2012cv12971
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jason Joy
Defendant:
Georgia, Eash, Wesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gorzewlewski
as 5:2011cv12296
Plaintiff:
Clifford Johnson
Defendant:
Kinga Gorzewlewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
