Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gooden et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 0:2022cv02835
Plaintiff:
Clifford Arnell Gooden, III, Carlos G. Byrd and Devonte A. Tracy
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Judge Meghan Corbin, Judge Marlita Greves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gooden v. Lane et al
as 0:2022cv02543
Petitioner:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent:
Tim Lane, Meghan Corbin and Elizabeth O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schuett v. LaRiva et al
as 0:2017cv00637
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Schuett
Defendant:
L. LaRiva, M. Smith, Reya-Cassette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuett v. Federal Medical Center - Rochester
as 0:2015cv04207
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Schuett
Defendant:
L. LaRiva and M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corscadden v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gary Corscadden
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeMasters v. Fabian
as 0:2009cv00702
Plaintiff:
James Clifford LeMasters, Jr.
Defendant:
Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Head, Jr v. Mills et al
as 0:2007cv03555
Plaintiff:
Robert George Head, Jr
Defendant:
Patrick Mills, Jason Lawrence, Donovan Wind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redding v. Hanlon et al
as 0:2007cv01576
Plaintiff:
Nico Redding
Defendant:
Jan Hanlon, Officer Peine, Sgt. Starkson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Roehrich et al
as 0:2007cv01777
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Martin
Defendant:
Connie Roehrich, Clifford and Officer Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roth v. Larson et al
as 0:2006cv04574
Plaintiff:
Jim Adam Roth
Defendant:
Nanette M. Larson, Jan Hanlon, David Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
