Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Jackson v. Bowen et al
as 4:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clifford D. Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr., ODRC Director Annette Chambers Smith, Jeff Mustard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bowen v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv03725
Petitioner:
Clifford J Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Eugene Clifford
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Debose v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
Terrance Debose
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Council, Armond D Budish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Turner
as 1:2021cv02088
Petitioner:
Clifford Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobbeldick et al v. Cuyahoga County Corrections Center et al
as 1:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Frank Golphin, Lawrence Jackson, Charles Jackson and others
Defendant:
Eric Ivey, Sheriff Clifford Pinkney, Cuyahoga County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Turner
as 1:2021cv00400
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner
Petitioner:
Clifford D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Bethard et al
as 2:2020cv06524
Defendant:
Fayette Co. Judge Steven Bethard, Matthew Wiedman and Darci Moore
Plaintiff:
Clifford D. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2020cv05611
Petitioner:
Clifford L. Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frett-Ali v. Sutula et al
as 1:2020cv02034
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Anderson Frett-Ali
Defendant:
Judge Kathleen Ann Sutula and Sheriff Clifford Pinkney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
