Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pemberton et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv07908
Plaintiff:
Christian Baptiste, Dr. Clyde Pemberton and Thomas Debnam
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYPD Officer Anthony Sengco, NYPD Officers John and Jane Does #1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale
as 1:2018cv08113
Plaintiff:
D. Williams
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Dan Smith, Omar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Bey et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04655
Plaintiff:
Steven Seymour, Clyde Phillips, Salik Bey and others
Defendant:
FDNY, City of New York, Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03401
Plaintiff:
Dennis Adams
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Detective Clyde Moyer, Detective Matthew Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clyde v. Town of Bennington, Vermont et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Andrew Clyde
Defendant:
Town of Bennington, Vermont , James Gulley, Nicholas Cervero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Itkin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Defendant:
City of New York, Stacy Meigs, Police Officer Clyde Moyer and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Itkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
