Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Harper v. State of Nebraska et al
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ernest Harper
Defendant:
State of Nebraska and State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Walker
as 1:2022cv06564
Petitioner:
Clyde Reid
Respondent:
Warden S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayo v. Walker
as 1:2022cv05810
Petitioner:
Maurice Mayo, William Harris, Randolph Maxwell and others
Respondent:
Warden S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerbick v. Mid-State Correctional Facility Medical Department
as 9:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Clyde Gerbick
Defendant:
Mid-State Correctional Facility Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomason v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2017cv01490
Defendant:
Ambulance Dept., County Of Nassau, Sgt. James Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clyde Thomason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomason v. Nassau County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2017cv00818
Defendant:
Ms. Michele Condel, Corporal Donnerry, Doctor P/A Merker and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clyde Thomason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. USA
as 1:2016cv00489
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Clyde C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muench v. Fisher et al
as 2:2014cv05186
Defendant:
Ray Baillard, Chloe Fisher, Cherl Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Joseph Muench
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerbrick v. Medical Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv06025
Plaintiff:
Clyde Gerbrick
Defendant:
Medical Dept. and Ben Oakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muench v. Ballard et al
as 1:2013cv07584
Plaintiff:
Karl Joseph Muench
Defendant:
Roy Ballard, Cathy Loeffler, Chloe Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
