Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Rutledge v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv02139
Defendant: Clyde King, Jr., DeJuana Collins, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff: Korey Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03372
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02532
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Howard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff: Clyde Earl
Defendant: Jonathan J. Howard , Steve Paschos , Tushar Advani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Espejo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff: Clyde Earl
Defendant: Antonio Espejo , Juan Gali , Arturo Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Com-ed Electric Company at , al et al
as 1:2016cv05386
Plaintiff: Clyde Williams
Defendant: Com-ed Electric Comapny and The Exelon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Dickerson III et al
as 1:2015cv10753
Plaintiff: Clyde Williams
Defendant: George Dickerson III, Sigma Security Services, The city and/or State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00751
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. City Of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01317
Plaintiff: Antwoine Hill and Clyde Jackson
Defendant: City of Chicago, Illinois, Roger Murphy and Thomas Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?