Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ferm v. Veltmann et al
as 4:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jack Ferm
Defendant:
Gary Ilmanen, Aziel Corporation, David Bryant, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Veltmann et al v. Ballard
as 4:2020cv02179
Plaintiff:
Aziel Corp. and Clyde Veltmann
Defendant:
John Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clyde Veltmann et al v. Heiting and Irwing Attorneys At Law et al
as 2:2012cv04187
Defendant:
Jeffrey Boyd, Jim Heiting, Heiting and Irwing Attorneys At Law and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Veltmann and Diantha Veltmann
Veltmann et al v. Heiting and Irwin Attorneys at Law et al
as 7:2012cv00008
Defendant:
Jeffrey Boyd, Jim Heiting, Heiting and Irwin Attorneys at Law and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Veltmann and Diantha Veltmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Hagan et al v. Craigmyle Halters and Tack Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 1:2011mc00016
Plaintiff:
Micheal H Hagan and Craigmyle Halter Company, LLC
Defendant:
Craigmyle Halters and Tack Manufacturing, LLC, Clyde Veltmann and Diantha Veltmann
Micheal Hagan, et al v. Craigmyle Halters and Tack Man, et al
as 11-55080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHEAL H. HAGAN, individually and on behalf of Craigmyle Halter Company, LLC, a California limited liability company and CRAIGMYLE HALTER COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
CRAIGMYLE HALTERS AND TACK MANUFACTURING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DBA The Craigmyle Company
Defendant - Appellant:
CLYDE VELTMANN, an individual and DIANTHA VELTMANN
Hagan v. CRAIGMYLE HALTERS AND TACK MANUFACTURING LLC, et al
as 3:2007mc00387
Plaintiff:
Micheal H. Hagan
Defendant:
CRAIGMYLE HALTERS AND TACK MANUFACTURING LLC, Clyde Veltmann and Diantha Veltmann
Micheal H Hagan et al v. Craigmyle Halters and Tack Manufacturing et al
as 5:2007cv00064
Plaintiff:
Micheal H Hagan and Micheal H Hagan
Defendant:
Craigmyle Halters and Tack Manufacturing and Clyde Veltmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
