Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MOBILE HWY PENSACOLA LLC et al v. SYNOVUS BANK et al
as 3:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
MOBILE HWY PENSACOLA LLC , SCOTT J BELL , CHARLES ALLCOTT, III and others
Defendant:
COLUMBUS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, COASTAL BANK AND TRUST OF FLORIDA, BANK OF PENSACOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Synovus Bank v. Craig Sims, et al
as 13-10137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SYNOVUS BANK, as successor in interest through name change and merger with Coastal Bank and Trust of Florida, successor by merger to Bank of Pensacola, f.k.a. Columbus Bank and Trust Company
Defendant - Appellant:
CRAIG R. SIMS, QUAIL LAKE DEVELOPERS LLC and DANIEL YANNETT
:
MARK LYONS, III
Lasko v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00353
Petitioner:
Barbara Jean Lasko
Respondent:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Alyssa Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
COASTAL BANK AND TRUST OF FLORIDA v. M/V GLORY et al
as 3:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
COASTAL BANK AND TRUST OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
M/V GLORY and JOE M TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COASTAL BANK AND TRUST OF FLORIDA
as 3:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
COASTAL BANK AND TRUST OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Coastal Bank and Trust of Florida v. Liqour and Poker et al
as 3:2009cv00276
Petitioner:
Coastal Bank and Trust of Florida
Defendant:
Liqour and Poker and Roger Sean Golden
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Coastal Bank and Trust of Florida v. Smithcraft of Florida, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
Coastal Bank and Trust of Florida and Coastal Bank and Trust of Florida
Defendant:
Smithcraft of Florida, LLC and Harvey Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
