Cases 21 - 30 of 188
JACKSON-GRADY v. STEPHENS et al
as 3:2018cv01246
Defendant:
NICHOLAS ADAM STEPHENS and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE JACKSON-GRADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01713
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dossenback v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01208
Plaintiff:
Michael Dossenback
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Monster Energy Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ernst v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.
as 8:2018cv02507
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Ernst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ernst v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.
as 8:2018cv02482
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Ernst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Orozco et al v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA Inc
as 5:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
James Young and Ernesto Orozco
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DELCINE WHEELER CONAWAY v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04245
Defendant:
COCA COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC., COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA, DOLLAR TREE STORES and others
Plaintiff:
DELCINE WHEELER CONAWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CHARLIE et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2018cv02827
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ALBERTHA CHARLIE and GARDIYEE CHARLIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
