Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bess et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03939
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bess
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Jr Ernest J Codilis, Jason Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Collins et al v. Shore et al
as 2:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Willantha Collins and Ludwig Brandl
Defendant:
Brian Shore, WM Specialty Mortgage LLC and Codilis And Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Gajewski et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv09230
Plaintiff:
Jozef Gajewski, Wieslawa Gajewski and Robert R. Gajewski
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Codilis and Associates, P.C. and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardney v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage et al
as 1:2014cv08486
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hardney
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Ernest J. Codilis and Associates and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peel et al v. 1st Advantage Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02404
Plaintiff:
Denise Peel and Tres Peel
Defendant:
1st Advantage Mortgage, LLC, Freddie Mac, Depositor (N/A) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peel v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv07679
Plaintiff:
Tres G. Peel
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Earnest J. Codilis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. Murphey et al
as 1:2013cv07017
Plaintiff:
Edgar Banks and Patricia Banks
Defendant:
Morgen Murphey , Ernest J. Codilis , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
