Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Williams v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Julian Williams
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Cody R. Parker, Cody Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 5:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Julian Williams
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Cody R. Parker, Corey Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Caudillo et al
as 5:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Charles B Miller, Richard Aynes, Olivia Caudillo and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDavid v. Smith Unit et al
as 5:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant:
Ranking Officers, Smith Unit, Deputy Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novak v. Parker, et al
as 5:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Smith Unit, Cody R. Parker, Latrista C. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamond Adams v. Michael Miller, et al
as 18-11097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMOND K. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. MILLER, Deputy Warden, WARDEN EDWARD PHARR, JR., CODY R. PARKER, Unit Major and others
Adams v. Miller et al
as 5:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Kamond K Adams
Defendant:
Michael R. Miller, Edward Pharr, Jr, Cody R. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krieg v. Keeney et al
as 5:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Henry Krieg
Defendant:
Joshua L Keeney, Nicky M Emsoff, Grayson W Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
