Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Evans v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Evans, III
Respondent:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv04915
Plaintiff:
Travis Berry
Defendant:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv03294
Plaintiff:
Travis Berry
Defendant:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Barnes
Defendant:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridwell v. Dansforth et al
as 1:2022cv00793
Petitioner:
Patrick Joe Bridwell
Respondent:
Warden Dansforth, Coffee Correctional Facility, Ga Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billings v. Upton et al
as 5:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Travis Billings
Defendant:
Steven Upton, Ricky Stone, Rickenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 5:2020cv00076
Defendant:
FNU Coley, FNU Clemens, Medical Dept at Coffee Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillsman v. Magistrate Judge et al
as 1:2020cv01255
Defendant:
Clarke County Parole Officer, Magistrate Judge, Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Rakeim Jaquin Hillsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Hall et al
as 5:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Anderson
Defendant:
Guy Augustin, Warden Hilton Hall, Deanna Wildes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
