Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Cohn, et al v. Critical Path Inc., et al
as 3:2001cv00551
Plaintiff:
Arnold Cohn , Florida State Board of Administration and Sambasiba Avirneni
Defendant:
Critical Path Inc., David Hayden, David A. Thatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Tethys Bioscience Inc v. Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC et al
as 3:2009cv05115
Plaintiff:
Tethys Bioscience Inc
Defendant:
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Tethys Bioscience Inc v. Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC et al
as 4:2009cv05115
Plaintiff:
Tethys Bioscience Inc
Defendant:
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
In the Matter of Mark Forrest Cohn - #85118
as 3:2008mc80229
Respondent:
Mark Forrest Cohn
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Pulis et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
as 4:2008cv04138
Plaintiff:
Peter Pulis, Gregory Cohn, Jennifer Cohn and others
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Pulis et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
as 3:2008cv04138
Plaintiff:
Peter Pulis, Gregory Cohn, Jennifer Cohn and others
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hickman et al v. Trust Deed Investments, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv03686
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hickman, Brenda Hickman, Betty Henry and others
Defendant:
Trust Deed Investments, Inc., Philip B. Goldstein, The Haskell Properties and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.