Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Barleta
as 1:2024mc00167
Defendant:
Joseph Cole Barleta and Joe Cole
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
COLE v. AFFLUENT ADS LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA COLE
Defendant:
AFFLUENT ADS LLC doing business as LEADNOMICS and RAPID RESPONSE MARKETING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CHRISTINA: HUNTER v. COLE GROUP REALTY
as 2:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
JENEE CHRISTINA: HUNTER
Defendant:
COLE GROUP REALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Dixon v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larmore et al
as 1:2023mc00622
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Johnathan Moynahan Larmore, ArciTerra Companies, LLC, ArciTerra Note Advisors II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LARMORE et al
as 2:2023mc00162
Receiver:
ALLEN D. APPLBAUM
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JONATHAN LARMORE, ARCITERRA COMPANIES, LLC, ARCITERRA NOTE ADVISORS II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LARMORE et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JONATHAN LARMORE, ARCITERRA COMPANIES, LLC, ARCITERRA NOTE ADVISORS II, LLC and others
Receiver:
ALLEN D. APPLBAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
USA v. James Cole
as 23-3105
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES COLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
