Cases 1 - 10 of 344
GADBORY v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 3:2024cv04306
Plaintiff:
LISA M GADBORY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Christine Dimter v. Commissioner Social Security
as 24-1350
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE E. DIMTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Karen Klyman v. Xavier Bacerra, et al
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
KAREN KLYMAN
Defendant:
XAVIER BACERRA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary and ACTING COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
COLEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
SHEILA D COLEMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Frank Nellom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-3215
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
FIELDS-NELSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv23079
Plaintiff:
TAMALYN MICHELLE FIELDS-NELSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
ABRAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv23082
Plaintiff:
Eric Abrams
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scott Repella v. Commissioner Social Security
as 23-3051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT JAMES REPELLA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Gilbert Martinez v. Commissioner Social Security
as 23-3000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Joseph Gaiambrone v. Commissioner Social Security
as 23-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GAIAMBRONE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
