Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Alford v. Committee for Purchase
as 21-2151
Petitioner:
LORETTA JEAN ALFORD
Respondent:
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED
Pride Industries, Inc. v. Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled et al
as 2:2019cv01620
Defendant:
United States of America, Thomas D. Robinson, Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled and others
Plaintiff:
Pride Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pride Industries, Inc. v. Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled et al
as 2:2019at00759
Defendant:
United States of America, Thomas D. Robinson, Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled and others
Plaintiff:
Pride Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Michael Collins v. Committee for Purchase from Pe, et al
as 09-5835
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL E. COLLINS
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED, TERESA LASSETER, Farm Services Agency-USDA, FARM SERVICES AGENCY-USDA and others
Collins v. Committee for Purchase from People who are Blind or Severely Disabled et al
as 2:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Collins, Michael E. Collins and Michael E. Collins
Defendant:
Committee for Purchase from People who are Blind or Severely Disabled, Teresa Lasseter, Teresa Lasseter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Platte River Industries, Inc. v. Committee For Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled
as 1:2007cv00842
Plaintiff:
Platte River Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Committee For Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled and Committee For Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
