Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Singh v. Hayden et al
as 1:2009cv04872
Plaintiff:
Jugvir Inder Singh
Defendant:
Michael V. Hayden, J.M. (Mike) McConnell, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pajkanovic v. Hulbert et al
as 1:2008cv05223
Petitioner:
Momo Pajkanovic
Respondent:
Thomas D. Hulbert, Jr., United States Marshal, Condoleeza Rice and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Uzamere v. Bush, et al
as 1:2008cv00891
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pinkard v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2008cv01122
Plaintiff:
Byron Pinkard
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, George W. Bush, Richard Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zheng et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2007cv04103
Plaintiff:
Qiao Zheng, Miao Zhu and Qi Zhu
Defendant:
United States Department of State, Condoleeza Rice, United States Embassy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michaels v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03619
Plaintiff:
Emil Michaels
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Emilio T. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zokari v. Rice et al
as 1:2007cv02878
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Ahmed Ayed Zokari
Defendant:
Condoleeza Rice and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Talukdar v. Rice
as 1:2007cv02856
Plaintiff:
Rukan Uddin Talukdar and Anjumanara Minu
Defendant:
Condoleeza Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
