Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty, Inc et al
as 4:2013mc00033
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty, Inc, Petroquest Resources, Inc., Harvey Milam and others
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty, Inc et al
as 4:2013mc00034
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty, Inc, Petroquest Resources, Inc., Harvey Milam and others
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00693
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty Inc, Petroquest Resources Inc, Harvey Milam and others
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00692
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty Inc, Petroquest Resources Inc, Harvey Milam and others
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00688
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty Inc, Petroquest Resources Inc, Harvey Milam and others
Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v. M3X Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01852
Plaintiff:
Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P.
Defendant:
M3X Media, Inc. and Condor Guaranty, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Condor Guaranty, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
M3X Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Richard Fogerty, et al v. Petroquest Resources Inc., et al
as 09-60193
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: CONDOR INSURANCE LIMITED, in Official Liquidation
Appellant:
RICHARD FOGERTY, in capacity as Joint Official Liquidator of Condor Insurance Limited and WILLIAM TACON, in capacity as Joint Official Liquidator of Condor Insurance Limited
Appellee:
PETROQUEST RESOURCES INC., HARVEY MILAM, BYRON TYGHE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00639
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
