Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vaughn et al v. County of Washington et al
as NYN/1:24-CV-00327
Plaintiff:
Vaughn, Michael Vaughn, Kevin Green and others
Defendant:
County of Washington and Al Nolette
Givens v. Palagummi, et al.
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS POITIER GIVENS
Defendant:
SAMBRAJYA PALAGUMMI, Doctor, C. CONKLIN and ROBERT CHAPNICK, M.D., Chief Medical Executive
Conklin v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 23-8003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK T. CONKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Defendant:
AFOD FRANZ JEUDY, DFODs SCOTT MECHKOWSKI, DARIUS REEVES and others
Lena LindbergIn re: Lena Lindberg
as 23-12425
Petitioner:
In re: LENA MARIE LINDBERG
Respondent:
MONICA GABBARD, CHRISTA CONKLIN, CARMEN REYES and others
CONKLIN MEDIA LLC v. EBERLY et al
as 2:2023cv02554
Plaintiff:
CONKLIN MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
JOSHUA EBERLY, PETER LANDIS, EBERLY HOLDINGS LLC and others
CONKLIN MEDIA LLC v. EBERLY et al
as 5:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
CONKLIN MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
JOSHUA EBERLY, PETER LANDIS, EBERLY HOLDINGS LLC and others
CONKLIN MEDIA LLC v. EBERLY et al
as 2:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
CONKLIN MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
JOSHUA EBERLY, PETER LANDIS and EBERLY HOLDINGS LLC
Conklin v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
as ILN/1:23-CV-03639
Plaintiff:
Conklin and Barbara Ellen Conklin
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
In Re: Tepezza Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv03568
In Re:
TEPEZZA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weibel, Lisa Christian Nethery, Donna Walker and others
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
