Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conlin v. Criner et al
as 7:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Jeremy L Conlin
Defendant:
Sheriff David Criner, Midland County and D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conlin v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Jeremy L Conlin
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Conlin v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00157
Petitioner:
Edward Donald Conlin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conlin v. Solarcraft, Inc.
as 4:2014cv01852
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Conlin
Defendant:
Solarcraft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Conlin v. Ligon
as 4:2011cv00411
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin
Respondent:
Brett Ligon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conlin v. Ligon
as 4:2010cv05257
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin
Respondent:
Brett Ligon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conlin v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 1:2010cv00109
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Regional Director, TDCJ-CID and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conlin v. Embarq Payphone Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01000
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Conlin
Defendant:
Embarq Payphone Services, Inc., Rick Thaler and Christina Melton Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
