Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Janine Grossnickle v. Connections Community Support Programs Inc, et al
as 22-1361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANINE GROSSNICKLE, as, Representative, of the estate of Tiffany Reeves
Defendant:
CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROGRAMS INC
Defendant / Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, MARC RICHMAN and ROBERT MAY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Grossnickle v. Connections Community Support Programs, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00715
Defendant:
Robert May, Perry Phelps, Marc Richman and others
Plaintiff:
Janine Grossnickle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Murach v. Bayhealth Medical Center, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Murach
Defendant:
Bayhealth Medical Center, LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Connections Community Support Programs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumlee v. Connections Community Support Programs, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
Stacy Plumlee
Defendant:
Connections Community Support Programs, Inc. , Michelle Murtha , Danielle Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
