Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Wilkens v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wilkens
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Stamford Police Department, Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rojas et al v. Top Notch Finishes, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10105
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Rojas, John Rincon and Luis Guerrero
Defendant:
Top Notch Finishes, Inc. and Conor Mckenna
Palkimas v. Stamford et al
as 3:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Palkimas and Richard Palkimas
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Chris Baker, Brendan Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dominguez v. Walsh et al
as 7:2022cv06443
Plaintiff:
Emily Dominguez
Defendant:
Thomas E. Walsh, II, Deidre Smith Withers, Conor Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Capolupo-Brooks v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2021cv01688
Plaintiff:
Shawna Capolupo-Brooks
Defendant:
Timothy O'Brien, Conor Hogan, Michael Campisano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McEneany v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv10370
Plaintiff:
CONOR MCENEANY
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nayak v. Kimco Realty Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv05501
Defendant:
Richard B. Saltzman, Milton Cooper, Henry Moniz and others
Plaintiff:
Mohan Nayak
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
