Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
American Forest Resource, et al v. Daniel Ashe, et al
as 13-5302
Plaintiff - Appellant: American Forest Resource Council, Carpenters Industrial Council and Douglas County, Oregon
Defendant - Appellee: Daniel M. Ashe, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Sally Jewell, Secretary of Interior
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Audobon Society of Portland, Seattle Audobon Society, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Kelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00427
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity , Defenders of Wildlife , Conservation Northwest and others
Defendant: Brian Kelly and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Conservation Northwest, et al v. Mark Rey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35729
Plaintiff - Appellee: CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, GIFFORD PINCHOT TASK FORCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant: MARK E REY
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: D.R. JOHNSON LUMBER COMPANY
Wyoming State Snowmobile Assoc, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 10-8105
Plaintiff - Appellee: WYOMING STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION and WASHINGTON STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and KENNETH SALAZAR
Intervenor - Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST and others
Wyoming State Snowmobile Assoc, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 10-8104
Plaintiff - Appellee: WYOMING STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION and WASHINGTON STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and KENNETH SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor - Appellant: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST and others
Wyoming State Snowmobile Assoc, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 10-8103
Plaintiff - Appellant: WYOMING STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION and WASHINGTON STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH SALAZAR and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor - Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST and others
Woodbrook Hunt Club et al v. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration et al
as 3:2010cv05527
Plaintiff: Woodbrook Hunt Club , Conservation Northwest , Tahoma Audubon Society and others
Defendant: United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Daniel M Mathis, United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Office of the United States Tr
as 10-35102
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, non-profit corporations
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Forest Stewardship Council-Uni, et al v. Office of the United States Tr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35985
Plaintiff - Appellant: FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL-UNITED STATES, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, non-profit corporations
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE, RON KIRK, U.S. Trade Representative, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv05605
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council, Natural Resources Defense Council, Conservation Northwest and others
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?