Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Brian Anderson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation a, et al
as 22-15832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN LYLE ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, DAVID SHINN, Director, Director - ADCRR, JOSEPH PROFIRI, Deputy Director - ADCRR and others
Hendley v. Lee et al
as 4:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adolpher Mayes Hendley
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, MSP Contract Health Services Employees, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center et al
as 1:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Craig P Ellis
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center, Ron Torrez, Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center's Contracted Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2010cv00741
Plaintiff:
Michael Blackman
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Felt, Klien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddrey v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
Eugene Maddrey
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, First Correctional Medical, James T Vaughn Correctional Center Medical Grievance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Contracted Health Services et al
as 1:2008cv00747
Plaintiff:
James Hall
Defendant:
Contracted Health Services, Phil Morgan, M. Moody and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2007cv00637
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Williams
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, First Correctional Medical, Delaware Correctional Center Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmad v. Contracted Health Services et al
as 1:2007cv00433
Plaintiff:
Shakir Taqi Ahmad
Defendant:
Contracted Health Services and Ionna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
