Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Dicks v. Yes Care Medical Company et al
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Dicks, Sr.
Defendant:
Yes Care Medical Company, Corizon Medical Company, Vincent O. Nwusor, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haley v. Hoover et al
as 1:2022cv01191
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lee Haley
Defendant:
Holly Hoover, Dr. A. Getachew, Dr. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Germain v. Beeman et al
as 1:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Jean Bernard Germain
Defendant:
William Beeman, Howard Cook, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Germain v. Beeman et al
as 1:2021cv02279
Plaintiff:
Jean Germain
Defendant:
William Beeman, Howard Cook, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cooke v. Gang, Warden et al
as 1:2019cv03256
Petitioner:
Stephen M. Cooke, Jr.
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Allen Gang, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savage v. Disharoon et al
as 8:2018cv01555
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Ferdale Savage
Defendant:
C Blades, John Doe, Cpl Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smart v. Queens Anne County et al
as 8:2017cv03671
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin F. Smart
Defendant:
Queens Anne County, Lamonte E. Cooke, Milton S. Greenwood, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. The Dept. of Corrections for Queens Anne County et al
as 8:2017cv03606
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin F Smart
Defendant:
The Dept. of Corrections for Queens Anne County, Aramark Inc, Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wulffers v. Graham, Jr. et al
as 8:2017cv03269
Plaintiff:
Theodore William Wulffers
Defendant:
Richard Graham, Jr., R.S. Weber, Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
