Cases 21 - 30 of 35
English et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 4:2013cv00469
Plaintiff:
Carol English and Eric English
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated , Cook Medical Incorporated , Cook Medical Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potkonjak v. Cook et al
as 2:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Steven Victor Potkonjak
Defendant:
Nancy Cook and Mitchell J Krebs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Smith
as 1:2012cv00281
Petitioner:
Steven James Cook
Respondent:
Johanna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Cook
as 4:2011cv00052
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Dean R. Cook
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Hiraga v. City of Salmon et al
as 4:2010cv00606
Plaintiff:
Barbara "Bobbi& J. Hiraga
Defendant:
City of Salmon and Cary Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams, et al v. USA
as 4:2003cv00049
Plaintiff:
Timm Adams , Barbara Adams , Arrow Head Potato Co and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc06765
Plaintiff:
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and others
Adams et al v. Van Camp & Deissner et al
as 2:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jon M Adams, Jon M Adams, Rae Jeanne Adams and others
Defendant:
Van Camp & Deissner, donald r shaw, David Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cook v. State of Idaho
as 3:2009cv00358
Petitioner:
Jack Keith Cook
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mickelsen v. Tingey et al
as 4:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Scott Lee Mickelsen
Defendant:
Joel Tingey, Richard St. Clair, Linda Cook and others
Debtor:
Unknown Deputy Sheriffs 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
