Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vehrs Vineyards v. Copper Cane, LLC
as 6:2018cv01752
Defendant:
Copper Cane, LLC
Plaintiff:
Vehrs Vineyard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gricks v. Norris & Stevens, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01307
Defendant:
Heather Copper, Norris & Stevens, Inc. and Stonebriar Apartments LLC
Plaintiff:
Kristin Gricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Boardman et al v. Pacific Seafood Group et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Amicu:
Attorney General of the State of Oregon
Defendant:
Bandon Pacific, Inc., Bio-Oregon Properties, LLC, Bio-Oregon Protein, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Boardman, MY Fisheries, Inc., Miss Sarah, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Dulcich, Inc. et al v. Mayer Brown LLP
as 3:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bandon Pacific, Inc., Bio-Oregon Properties, LLC, Bio-Oregon Protein, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mayer Brown LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Whaley, et al v. Pacific Seafood Group, et al
as 1:2010cv03057
Defendant:
Bandon Pacific, Inc., Bio-Oregon Properties, LLC, Bio-Oregon Protein, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd D. Whaley and Todd L. Whaley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Arkema, Inc. et al v. A & C Foundry Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Arkema, Inc., Chevron U.S.A., Inc., City of Portland and others
Defendant:
A & C Foundry Products, Inc., Abrams Scrap Metal Co., Alaska Tanker Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 CERCLA Hazardous Waste Cleanup Costs
Webber v. Giffin et al
as 6:2007cv01675
Plaintiff:
John Carl Webber, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremy Giffin, Kyle Gorman, Dove Gutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webber v. Giffin et al
as 2:2007cv01675
Plaintiff:
John Carl Webber, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremy Giffin, Kyle Gorman, Dove Gutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
