Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WILKINS et al v. GENZYME CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv10023
Plaintiff:
DARLENE COOKINGHAM, AMBER BRITTON, John Cortina and others
Defendant:
sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis SA, SANOFI CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales et al v. Advanced Detailing Concepts et al
as 1:2017cv10234
Plaintiff:
Raymond Morales, Pedro Rosado, Jose Carasquillo and others
Defendant:
Advanced Detailing Concepts and Richard Lavoie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Morales et al v. Advanced Detailing Concepts et al
as 3:2017cv10234
Plaintiff:
Raymond Morales , Pedro Rosado , Jose Carasquillo and others
Defendant:
Advanced Detailing Concepts, Inc. and Richard Lavoie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Reyes-Cordova v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10355
Plaintiff:
Litza D. Reyes-Cordova
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc, Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adamo, et al. v. Genzyme Corporation, et al.
as 1:2013cv11336
Plaintiff:
Philip Adamo , James Beadnell , Joy Beadnell and others
Defendant:
Genzyme Corporation and Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson et al v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv40132
Plaintiff:
Shane Jackson, Patrick Compere, Rogelio Tatis Mercado and others
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Thomas B Duffy, Gerald Montivedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordova v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv40136
Plaintiff:
Angel Cordova
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, James Guittar and Terrance Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordova v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv30221
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carlos Arnando Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cordova v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv30169
Plaintiff:
Lisandra Cordova
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
