Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15106
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, Former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, CORIZON, Medical Service Provider at ADC, named as Corizona Health Incorporated per [33], AKA Corizon Health Incorporated, BRENDA ROJAS, Corizon Facility Health Administrator at ADC ASPC Eyman and others
Lee Beitman v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 21-16000
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, MARTIN GRUENBERG, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEE MICHAEL BEITMAN
Defendant: CORRECT CLEAR SOLUTIONS, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Doe 1, Healthcare Provider at Correct Clear Solutions; Doe 2, Healthcare Provider at Corizon Health Incorporated and BENNIE ROLLINS
Devin Andrich v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 19-16826
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOE COONS, CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE ELLIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEVIN ANDRICH
Devin Andrich v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 19-15598
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOE COONS, CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE ELLIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEVIN ANDRICH
Joseph Assyd v. ADOC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-15610
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH M. ASSYD, AKA Joe M. Assyd
Defendant - Appellee: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH INCORPORATED, TRINITY INCORPORATED and others
Melinda Valenzuela v. Corizon Health Incorporated, et al
as 17-17366
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee: CORIZON HEALTH INCORPORATED, KELLY ROGERS, F.H.A. and N. CHADOFF, N.P.
Nathan Mason v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17254
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHAN STERLING MASON
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, JOSHUA BAESE, CO II / SSU, CORIZON HEALTH INCORPORATED, contracted healthcare provider, AKA Corizon LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?