Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Sheldon Mechanical Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv04004
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE AIRCONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION INDUSTRY HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE AIRCONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION INDUSTRY RETIREMENT TRUST FUND; BOARD OF T, Board of Trustees of the Piping Industry Progress and Education Fund, Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
SHELDON MECHANICAL CORPORATION, a California corporation; DANIEL J. BOUTE, an individual; and STANLEY M. NISENSON an individual,, Stanley M. Nisenson, Sheldon Mechanical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Acrisure of California, LLC v. SoCal Commerical Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10187
Plaintiff:
ACRISURE OF CALIFORNIA, LLC a Michigan limited liability company and Acrisure of California, LLC
Defendant:
SoCal COMMERICAL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation; PAUL J. SMITH, an individual; KENNETH D. SMITH, an individual; and Does 1 through 20 inclusive, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Paul J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States for the Use and Benefit of W and J Lazaro v. Turner Construction Company
as 5:2018cv01449
Petitioner:
Corporation W&J Lazarno dba Alex Trucking
Defendant:
Turner Construction Company, Federal Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of W and J Lazaro and United States for the Use and Benefit of W and J Lazaro a California corporation doing business as Alexis Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Corporal Caleb J. Linn v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00622
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Corporal Caleb J Linn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
