Cases 41 - 50 of 77
BRUSCA v. AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE et al
as 2:2017cv02559
Petitioner:
ROBERT BRUSCA
Defendant:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE , JANE DOE I-V, JOHN DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Howell v. Zimmer US Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01749
Plaintiff:
Robert R Howell
Defendant:
Zimmer U.S., Inc. , ZIMMER INC and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANTO v. CARE ONE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01569
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA YANTO
Defendant:
CARE ONE, LLC , JANE DOE I-V, JOHN DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DALAL v. OHM LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05445
Plaintiff:
BHARAT DALAL
Defendant:
OHM LABORATORIES, INC. , SUN PHARMA COMPANY, RANBAXY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HUMMER v. FIRST TRANSIT, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05043
Plaintiff:
KAREN HUMMER
Defendant:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC. , JANE DOE I-V, XYZ CORPORATION I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SANTANA v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01702
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SANTANA
Defendant:
SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC , JOHN DOES I-V and ABC CORPORATIONS I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUMPHREYS v. WYNDAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
WYNDAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC. , JANE DOE I-V and XYZ CORPORATION I-V
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
EUSEBI v. BRUCIE et al
as 3:2015cv08297
Plaintiff:
THEODORE EUSEBI
Defendant:
PATRICK F. BRUCIE, ABC CORPORATIONS I-V and JOHN DOES I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
