Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Dunsmore v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dunsmore
Defendant:
State of Montana, Corrections Corporation of America, Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hirt v. Law et al
as 4:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Patrick Keith Hirt
Defendant:
Sam Law, Mike Mahoney, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKeon v. Ferriter et al
as 4:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Christopher A McKeon
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Elizabeth Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKeon v. Ferriter et al
as 9:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Christopher A McKeon
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Elizabeth Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Law et al
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Paul Hartson Fletcher
Defendant:
Sam Law, Assistant Warden Ivins, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copelton v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 4:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
John O. Copelton
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, Canteen Correctional Services, Crossroads Correctional Center, C.C.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Correctional Corporation of America
as 4:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Young
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Avila-Rivera v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Salvador Avila-Rivera
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cascade County Detention Center, Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Corrections Corporations of America et al
as 6:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Mark Cochran
Defendant:
Corrections Corporations of America, Jim MacDonald, Sam Law and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
