Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SANUSI v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv07584
Plaintiff:
RASAQ OPEYEMI SANUSI
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
RAZA v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06213
Plaintiff:
J. ALBERTO GONZALE RAZA
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. , DAVID MYERS, GAY VICK, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTEGA v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv04003
Plaintiff:
GRACE ORTEGA
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and ANGELA DEPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MUDEY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv01669
Plaintiff:
AMINA BOOKEY MUDEY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DAVID SMELSON, CHANG PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOB v. DOCTOR KUO et al
as 2:2008cv02279
Plaintiff:
NATA S. BOB
Defendant:
DOCTOR KUO, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and C. COLLINES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
