Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Smith v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv01372
Plaintiff:
Cory Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woffard v. Tulsa Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00729
Plaintiff:
Cory Woffard
Defendant:
Tulsa Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
Cory Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flow v. Thomas et al
as 5:2009cv01262
Plaintiff:
Jason Urian Flow
Defendant:
Lt Thomas, Cory Green, Lieutenant Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American National Property And Casualty Company v. Hoover et al
as 5:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
American National Property And Casualty Company and American National Property And Casualty Company
Defendant:
Steven Kyle Hoover, Orin Amos, Jesse Lee McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Martin v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Nathan B Martin
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Latosha Fuston, Oklahoma City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Cory et al
as 5:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Nathan B Martin
Defendant:
Mike Cory, Jeffery Davis, Family Dollar Store Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cory Investments Ltd v. Multimedia Games Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00870
Plaintiff:
Cory Investments Ltd
Defendant:
Multimedia Games Inc, Robert F Lannert, Gordon Graves and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Inuwa v. Wright et al
as 4:2007cv00276
Plaintiff:
Aminu Inuwa
Defendant:
Marcus Wright, Micki Hawkins, Clifford Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
