Cases 1 - 10 of 365
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moussa Diarra v. John Doe, et al
as 24-10947
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NRA DIARRA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Cobb Jail Medical Doctor, SPEARS, Mental Health Counselor and KIMBERLY, Mental Health Counselor
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Trevelis D. Jackson
Defendant:
Counselor Perry, Correctional Officer Guyton, Sgt. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS DIVINCI JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, WARDEN GRACE, CERT OFFICER LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaquille Jenkins v. Augusta State Medical Prison, et al
as 24-10395
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE RASHAD JENKINS
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON, GREEN, SCREWS and others
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv20375
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Quantovia Robinson
Defendant:
Counselor Smith, Officer Carver, Counselor Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. MACON STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVE
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN MCDANIEL, SPECIAL AGENT WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
