Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 358
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant: GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff: John H. Sloan
Defendant: Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cousik, et al v. Winters, et al
as 24-1124
Plaintiff: TARIN ALLEN, TEJAS COUSIK, JAKE DOUGLAS and others
Defendant: JOSHUA WINTERS, Aurora Police Officer, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, AUSTIN RUNYON, Aurora Police Officer and others
Runkle v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff: AMY M. RUNKLE
Defendant: STATE OF COLORADO, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MICHAEL MARTINEZ, Former Chief Judge and others
Hines (PS) v. Denver et al
as 1:2024cv00845
Plaintiff: Dontae Hines and Dontae D. Hines
Defendant: Denver, City and County of Denver, Denver Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendenhall v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff: Michael L. Mendenhall and Michael Mendenhall
Defendant: City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Niccum et al
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff: Darnell Washington
Defendant: Andrew Niccum, Christopher Cochran, Jacob Vaporis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis v. Pazen, et al
as 23-1313
Plaintiff / Appellee: SUZY DENNIS
Defendant / Appellant: PAUL PAZEN, in his individual capacity
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, CITY OF ARVADA, CITY OF GOLDEN and others
Jensen v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv01783
Plaintiff: Ronald Jensen
Defendant: Cody Lane and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?