Cases 11 - 20 of 494
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis v. Pazen, et al
as 23-1313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUZY DENNIS
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL PAZEN, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, CITY OF ARVADA, CITY OF GOLDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Jensen v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv01783
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jensen
Defendant:
Cody Lane and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Song Yang
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Debets, Debets (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp - Fed. Question - Violation of Due Process
Benson et al v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Brenton Benson and Regan Benson
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, John Schaal, FNU Courier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faustin v. Polis et al
as 1:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Wendy Faustin
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Philip J. Weiser, John Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holcomb v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Glynda Holcomb
Defendant:
City of Denver Police Department, City and County of Denver Public Defender, Yum!, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
